NEW EPA RULING ON OPT OUT PROVISION

April 29th, 2010

Lead Paint Rule Opt-Out Revoked

On April 23, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced release of an amendment to the Lead: Renovation, Repair and Painting rule that removes the opt-out provision for pre-1978 homes without pregnant women or children under age six in residence.

The amendment also instructs contractors to provide a copy of the records required under the rule to be shared with home owners within 30 days of completing the remodeling work.

The amendment goes into force 60 days from its publication in the Federal Register, which has not yet occurred. NAHB expects publication in the Federal Register sometime in the next few weeks, so the estimated effective date to remove the opt-out is the beginning of July. Once the exact date is determined, NAHB will update its members.

Nevertheless, all provisions of the Lead: Renovation, Repair and Painting rule went into effect on April 22, which requires remodelers and other contractors disturbing painted surfaces in pre-1978 homes attend the required training and submit firm certification. The rule also dictates lead-safe work practices, pre-renovation consumer education, and record keeping practices.

The amendment to the rule goes into effect in July 2010 and

  • Removes the opt-out provision. Under the current rule, owner-occupied pre-1978 housing units (i.e., not inclusive of rental properties) where no pregnant women nor children under age six, nor a property qualifying as a “child occupied facility” (such as a day care facility) could sign a waiver. The remodelers must keep a record of the waiver for three years, which waives the implementation of the work practices dictated by the rule. The new amendment to the regulation that goes into effect in July revokes the opt-out completely. All work in pre-1978 must then follow all work practices dictated by the regulation as of the effective date in July.
  • Requires remodelers to share rule compliance records with customers. Remodelers will have to share a copy of the compliance records required for remodelers under the regulation (such as the checklist of followed practices) with home owners within 30 days of completion of the work.

The EPA has also given advanced notice of additional plans to change the lead rule as a direct result of a voluntary legal settlement with several environmental groups that challenged the original regulation. Specifically, rule makings will be conducted to

  • Require abatement-style dust wipe testing and share results with home occupants and owners. This rule change will apply to certain remodeling activities and require the contractor to achieve the EPA’s strict numerical limits for lead dust levels on window sills, window troughs, and floors. The EPA’s numerical lead dust standards are the same as those dictated to lead-based paint abatement firms for achieving “clearance” under EPA’s abatement rules. Depending on the outcome of this upcoming amendment, remodelers and other contractors may also be subject to additional regulatory restrictions at the state and local level triggered by the knowledge of disturbing lead-based paint. After this proposal is published, it will be out for a 60 day comment period with the goal of completing and finalizing this rule change in July 2011.
  • Apply the lead rule to public and commercial buildings. The EPA plans to amend the rule to expand its scope over both public and commercial buildings. NAHB will follow this development but expects the proposal to come out after the clearance testing amendment.

Rule Enforcement

EPA Assistant Administrator Owens visited the NAHB Remodelers Board of Trustees meeting last week to answer questions about the lead paint regulation effective April 22. He explained that the EPA will not take enforcement action against firms that in good faith submitted firm certification paperwork before April 22 but have not received official approval yet from EPA. A copy of the letter is available for download. However, the EPA will still be taking enforcement actions against parties that fail to follow work practices in pre-1978 homes.

Future Actions

NAHB is closely following the continuing actions of the EPA to amend the rule and will be commenting and asking members to submit comments on proposed rule changes.

On May 20 at 2 pm EDT, NAHB is hosting a webinar free for members about the lead rule, removal of the opt-out, and guidance for remodelers on managing requirements of the rule. Registration for this event will be available shortly.

HEAT PUMP WATER HEATERS

April 9th, 2010

By now you may have seen this new style of water heater out in the market. Both Lowes and Home Depot have them on display. We first came across these in August 2009. I was intrigued. After doing some investigation I was impressed enough to install one in my house as a test. This was the AirTap water heater attachment. This unit is not an integrated unit. You have to have a tank water heater to install this on top of. This tank in theory only functions as the reserve tank for the AirTap to work from. Any power to the tank water heater is turned off, in theory. The advantage to this is that a conversion can be less expensive. Our AirTap lists about $700. Installation was done by our plumbing crew and it was not a complicated install. Relative to the time it takes to replace a tank water heater. You do need a drain for condensate and a 110 V electrical outlet. At first we thought we hit a winner. The water was as hot as it needed to be. However, as time went on the limitations began to surface. One is the amount of hot water this unit can produce. When someone takes a long hot shower (we have a 21 yr old daughter-need I say more) we run out of hot water. Thus when we wanted to wash dishes we had to wait. This made my wife unhappy. I never want to do that. Never! So we made some adjustments by starting up the existing tank water heater. By setting it at a low temperature we increased the recovery thus the amount of hot water produced. I took a while to get that adjustment right but at this time we have it down to where we do not run out of hot water-often. Additionally this goes against the manufacturer’s recommendations. The fuel efficiency was reduced as well. Needless to say I am disappointed not being able to recommend this unit to our customers. It will work if one is willing to manage the use and assess that their hot water needs are less than the average household. Unfortunately AirTap is not at this time approved for use in VA. We were informed that it is approved in other states but that is not confirmed. With the above said it caused me to look harder at the more expensive option of integrated (hybrid) heat pump water heaters. These have an electrically heated tank as a back up system. Hence the tank and heat pump work in concert with each other so as to maintain the temperature and recovery. This does what we are trying to do with adjusting my tank water heater and AirTap heat pump. I do not have any immediate plans to install one of hybrid units in my house. We have also not installed any of these hybrid units in one of our customers either. However, from what research I have uncovered and from my own experience it seems that this style of heaters will work and work well. Many of the reputable water heater companies have produced their own. Considering too that the technology in not new. It is a heat pump and an electric water heater. How long have we had that in the market? What is new is the technology being applied to heater waters for the residential market. As far as efficiency the manufacturers claim these units use much less kilowatts than conventional water heaters. One manufacturer states that at $0.10 per kWh their HPWH will use $185.60 of electric per year. A standard water heater can use $488.10 per year. That is a total of $320.50 savings. The big question is will it pay off? At best calculations the variable between replacing standard vs. HPWH is about $1200.00. That puts the break even point at approximately 4 years. Not bad. However with replacement, there is at this moment the tax rebate everyone is trying to take advantage of. That will bring the breakeven point much closer. Not bad again. We feel these water heaters are definitely something to consider. Especially if you are in the market to replace. Being in the market should not be isolated to those that have a leaking tank water heater. With the tax rebate closing you might want to consider looking at your existing water heater to determine its age. This can be done by the manufacturer’s serial #. If it is any older than 10 years, not producing the way it has in the past, or making those popping sounds, you should be in the market for replacement. The house has gotten its use out of the water heater. Of course these water heaters, because of their efficiency are reducing our carbon footprint. Hence this is another way of doing our part to save our future energy resources.

Thanks for visiting our blog.

Nick Falletta
President

Need some help? Dont know who to call?

March 20th, 2010

73271466

We can fix it, 540-343-0333

Looking for a Plumber in Virginia?

March 17th, 2010

Check out this link , visit some friend of ours ;

Best Plumbers In Virginia

seeya

Sometimes plumbing is not fun, and sometimes it is……..

March 16th, 2010


Vezi mai multe video Haioase

Tired of getting your drains inspected the old way?

March 11th, 2010

66 Creative Plumbing

Call us, not only do we have infrared/night vision camera’s where you can see what we see, we can make a video so you can show your friends……….

NEW EPA LEAD BASED PAINT RULE

March 11th, 2010

As many are aware, the EPA has created a mandatory procedure for work done to a home or business that involves any disturbance of lead based paint. It is called the Renovate Repair and Paint Rule (RRP). The federal government banned lead-based paint from housing in 1978. Any home built before this year thus can be suspect to the use of lead based paint. Common renovation activities like sanding, cutting, and demolition can create hazardous lead dust and chips by disturbing lead-based paint, which can be harmful to adults and children.
To protect against this risk, on April 22, 2008, EPA issued a rule requiring the use of lead-safe practices and other actions aimed at preventing lead poisoning. Under the rule contractors performing renovation, repair and painting projects that disturb lead-based paint in homes, child care facilities, and schools built before 1978 must be certified and must follow specific work practices to prevent lead contamination.
With the above said, when myself and my operation staff first attended the certification training class we were to be honest skeptical. Is it another government scheme to cash in? That question was answered during the class. This rule is to truly protect the public. Lead based paint can easily enter the body through several ways and create serious health issues. One video presented showed how a contractor had poisoned his family by bringing home lead based paint dust on his clothing. That was an eye opener. With that said it only makes sense to protect the public. This of course will create a cost factor for the client. However considering the risk it truly is worth it. Additionally the cost should not be prohibitive. Any good contractor should perform due diligence with dust control and clean up. Whether that be lead-based or not. It is true that the procedure for lead based paint raises the bar. There is certain equipment (such as specialty vacuum) needed to comply. The cost for training is an expense also. All other cost items can and should be part of the job. The greatest impact will be on the small contractor. If they do one job a year that will require the application of this rule, they will have a hard time justifying the equipment and training costs. Many might choose not to do it. In the end that might not be much of their work anyway. Consider the rule applies only to structures built before 1978 and if there is more that 6 square feet of lead-based paint surface disturbed. The outside work will not require specialty equipment. Hence the only cost the small contractor faces is the training. While training and education does cost it really should be viewed as an asset. This is because it increases your customer service level and good customer service makes money.
If you would like more info and please feel free to contact us. Or you can visit the EPA website at http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/lead/index.html.
Thanks for visiting our blog.

Nick Falletta
President

Tired of watching your husband try things?

March 2nd, 2010

fail-owned-faucet-failWe can fix it, just give us a call 540-343-0333

Your Handyman just not getting the job done?

March 1st, 2010

7619_134895941378_609921378_2708605_1813134_n
Give us a call 540-343-0333 , we understand

Tired of that old faucet , Need a waterheater real bad?

February 28th, 2010

c16c267c21

Give us a call, 540-343-0333 anytime